Flat composite, split market: transpacific up, Asia–Europe down
The global number did not move. Underneath it, one corridor set fresh highs and another fell 10% in a week. The clearest case this year for reading corridors rather than composites.
Index levels assessed 3 September 2026. This is the weekly briefing as it was published — it is not updated afterwards. For the current position on your lanes, use the rate explorer.
The week in numbers
| Lane | Level | Week |
|---|---|---|
| Composite | $4,465 | flat |
| Shanghai – Rotterdam | $4,092 | −5% |
| Shanghai – Genoa | $4,368 | −10% |
| Shanghai – Los Angeles | $7,185 | +5% |
| Shanghai – New York | $9,587 | +3% |
What moved, and why
- The composite held at $4,465 per 40ft because the two big corridors cancelled each other out.
- Shanghai–Genoa fell 10% in a single week and Shanghai–Rotterdam 5%, while Shanghai–Los Angeles rose 5% and Shanghai–New York 3%.
- The 1 September general rate increase held on both US coasts — the seventeenth on the East Asia to USA lane this year, against roughly six in a normal year.
- A run of typhoons since mid-July kept Chinese ports congested, tightening effective capacity on both corridors. Carriers omitted calls and rerouted through transhipment hubs, which protects schedules but displaces cargo.
- Six transpacific blank sailings were announced for the following week, double the week before.
What it meant for a quote
This was the week to stop quoting anything off a global composite. A customer waving an index at you had a 10% move on one corridor and a 5% move the other way on another, inside the same flat headline. Establish which index, which port pair and which basis before conceding a cent.
Goes deeper
Full analysis: why the two corridors split, and why two indices disagreed on the same lane
Sources
- Drewry World Container Index, assessment for 3 September 2026, and Drewry Container Capacity Insight.
- FreightWaves, 2 September 2026, citing Freightos rate data.
- Alba, market update for September 2026, on the general rate increase count.
Figures are as published by the named third parties on the dates given. They are not SeaFreightPrices benchmarks; our own methodology is set out on the methodology page.